Clinical development and current role of margetuximab for the treatment of breast cancer.

Up to 20% of breast cancers overexpress HER2, a molecular alteration conferring these tumors a particularly aggressive behavior. However, targeting HER2 has radically changed the prognosis of this disease in the last 2 decades, with multiple anti-HER2 compounds shown to improve disease outcomes both in the early and advanced setting. The latest anti-HER2 compound to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was margetuximab, an Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody with an improved binding to FcγRIIIA receptor, which leads to a greater antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activation compared with trastuzumab. Margetuximab was shown to slightly improve progression-free survival compared with trastuzumab when combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients, and is now included among the available treatment options for pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients. In this monograph we recapitulate the clinical development, current role and future perspectives of margetuximab for the treatment of breast cancer.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular breast cancer: A systematic review of the literature and metanalysis.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) for patients with localized lobular breast cancer (ILC) is still controversial. It is unclear what is the magnitude of benefit of the CT in this setting. In this systematic review of the literature and metanalysis, we aimed to estimate the benefit of aCT in addition to the standard treatments in the early ILC setting. We identified the records by searching Medline, CENTRAL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, and the meeting proceeding of the principal oncology meetings of the last 10 years, with no language or time restriction. A research strategy was developed with mapped and MeSH terms. Studies on the clinical use of aCT reporting survival outcomes in the ILC setting were double-screened and tabulated. PRISMA methodology was used for data extraction and synthesis. We extracted information on the study design and setting, eligible population and population size, histology variants, menopausal status, treatment regimens, follow-up duration. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted and transformed into logHR and corresponding standard error to obtain the Summary HR (SHR). Heterogeneity (I2 statistics) and publication bias (Macaskill test) were tested; a random effect models provided by SAS Proc Mixed was used for data analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the impact of inclusion criteria on the summary results. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were the primary endpoints of the investigation. The systematic review and metanalysis included 38,387 patients across 8 clinical studies. aCT was not associated with an improvement of OS (SHR 0.99; 95%CI 0.86-1.14), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 28%) and no publication bias (p = 0.43). Sensitivity analysis resulted in unchanged conclusions. We did not perform a metanalysis of the DFS estimates, as only reported in 3 studies. The value of aCT in improving DFS was unconfirmed, consistently with the OS results. Our research did not confirm a certain role of aCT for patients with ILC. Research gaps were identified, warranting the development of prospective, controlled ad hoc investigations.